CricketBeautiful
Forum God
I am a Zark.
0 fics uploaded
Registration Date: 04-04-2004
Posts: 1211
|
|
Elvin, don't rate all socialized health care by that.
A non-caring or under-funded HMO might have done the same.
Here, despite the problems and underfunding and losing doctors due to underpaying them, it means we don't have to worry about not being able to afford the vaccinations, and that small things get treated before they get bigger. It means my neighbour with four kids and a dead-beat ex doesn't have to decide between the doctor or supper. It means that expectant moms go to the doctor every month, then every week, so that pre-eclempsia or gestational diabetes (both symptomless) is caught before the child is injured.
We don't have to call for permission to go to emerg, but we do have Telecare (love it!) which can help you decide if it's worth it -- so often, all you need is reassurance and a new idea, or the signs to watch for. And they always say to go in if things change.
Sure, there are problems -- there's no perfect system -- but I hate the alternative.
__________________
Between stimulus and response there is a space.
In that space is our power to choose our response.
In our response lies our growth and our freedom.
- Viktor E. Frankl
|
|
30-09-2004 15:23
|
|
Berg Katse
Pleather Goddess
0 fics uploaded
Registration Date: 06-06-2001
Posts: 216
|
|
Interesting discussion....
When all is said and done, the problems of Iraq, of the president of the US and the presidential candidate, the healthcare system, the Middle East, can all be boiled down to one common denominator.
Money.
Those who have money want more of it, those who don't, want to control it. Pharmaceutical companies, governments, multinational corporations, powerful ruling families. It's all about who has the cash, and who is stuffing whose pockets with that cash. We're all paying the price for those few greedy people that truly control our world--our at least, the true background upon which our society is built.
Just look at it--the world is over a barrel now--a barrel of oil, highest prices in ages. No other reason than political, when you get down to it. The US uses 64% of the world's oil reserves, and yet, only has 3% of all the world's oil on its land. Oil prices determine the prices of everything else in the world--manufacturing, stock market, transportation, everything is related to oil, which is nothing more than liquid cash.
Pharmaceutical companies--I've seen the ads that now run on American TV saying that the high price paid for brand name drugs is worth it because it funds new drugs. That's bullshit. Billions of dollars are spent each year by pharmaceutical companies on advertising. Only about $500 million is on research and development--if that. And the pharmaceutical companies are presently funding the political campaigns. Their money controls the politicians to some degree. The government in the US now wants to make it mandatory to test all American residents and especially children for mental health problems before being allowed to go to school. If the parents refuse to have them assessed, or medicated, the parents are charged with neglect and the children are removed from their care. This has already happened with teachers recommended students be put on drugs and, when the parents didn't comply, in came Welfare. If their is mandatory screening, more people will be prescribed drugs--drugs the companies make. They earn money, money that funds the politicians. The politicians then have it in their best interest to pass laws against generic drugs being sold at cheaper prices, both in their country and abroad. They have a reason to pass legislation preventing drugs coming in from Canada--though right now they're saying Canadian drugs can't be trusted because they're not made to US standards--which is actually a load of bullshit, seeing as most drugs sold in America are developed and made here anyhow.
And the problem with money is how it makes everyone act. Merck is recalling Vioxx because it may have caused over 27 000 heart attacks. The FDA should have noted this. But once again, money talks here too. The politicians (funded by the pharmies) appoint people to the FDA advisory board. The latest appointed minister to the board is a man who is extremely religious and is spearheading the reform of national healthcare to create "Catholic based" health plans for workers (already coming into affect in Illinois), health care that does not include any form of birth control, no matter the circumstance, no abortion, and no fertility treatments. Now the FDA advisors have a good reason not to go against the pharmies--that's who landed them their jobs, through the politicians. So the FDA has a rule that states pharmaceutical companies approaching them with new medications DO NOT REQUIRE THIRD PARTY RESEARCH RESULTS. The FDA advisory panel simply looks at the research done by the company itself on the drug, and under their research, decides whether it should be improved. No one checks the pharmaceutical companies and their research claims. And look at what has come of it: Rezulin, Vioxx, what next?
And it all comes down to money. Life, war, peace, death--these don't mean anything. In the end, it all comes down to money.
Katse
|
|
08-10-2004 04:57
|
|
|
|
|